Main Article Content

Abstract

Community and civic participation are widely viewed as critical to strengthening accountability in public service delivery, yet empirical evidence from low- and middle-income countries remains limited. This paper examines the role of inclusive community-based participation in promoting accountability in public health project implementation in Bangladesh. Drawing on secondary sources—including government reports, NGO and donor evaluations, and published studies on social audits conducted between 2015 and 2023—the study applies qualitative content analysis to assess participation patterns, inclusion of marginalized groups, and the effects of social audits on transparency, provider responsiveness, and citizen trust. The findings show that social audits enhanced information disclosure, reduced minor service irregularities, and improved dialogue between communities and frontline health workers. Inclusive participation, particularly involving women, the poor, ethnic minorities, and community-based organizations, was associated with stronger follow-up actions and more sustainable accountability outcomes. However, the effectiveness of participation was often constrained by power asymmetries, limited awareness, and unequal facilitation, which restricted the meaningful engagement of marginalized groups. Overall, the study argues that accountability cannot be achieved through technical tools alone but depends on the depth and quality of community and civic engagement. Strengthening facilitation, ensuring safe and inclusive participatory spaces, and linking social audit findings to formal response mechanisms are essential for improved outcomes. This synthesis contributes to debates on participatory governance and offers practical insights for policymakers, development practitioners, and civil society actors seeking to enhance accountability and inclusiveness in Bangladesh’s public health system.


[Partisipasi masyarakat dan sipil secara luas dipandang sangat penting untuk memperkuat akuntabilitas dalam pemberian layanan publik, namun bukti empiris dari negara-negara berpenghasilan rendah dan menengah masih terbatas. Makalah ini mengkaji peran partisipasi berbasis masyarakat yang inklusif dalam mempromosikan akuntabilitas pada implementasi proyek kesehatan publik di Bangladesh. Dengan menggunakan sumber sekunder—termasuk laporan pemerintah, evaluasi LSM dan donor, serta studi yang dipublikasikan mengenai audit sosial yang dilakukan antara tahun 2015 dan 2023—penelitian ini menerapkan analisis isi kualitatif untuk menilai pola partisipasi, inklusi kelompok marginal, serta dampak audit sosial terhadap transparansi, responsivitas penyedia layanan, dan kepercayaan warga. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa audit sosial meningkatkan keterbukaan informasi, mengurangi penyimpangan layanan skala kecil, dan meningkatkan dialog antara masyarakat dengan petugas kesehatan garda depan. Partisipasi inklusif, terutama yang melibatkan perempuan, masyarakat miskin, etnis minoritas, dan organisasi berbasis masyarakat, dikaitkan dengan tindakan tindak lanjut yang lebih kuat dan hasil akuntabilitas yang lebih berkelanjutan. Namun, efektivitas partisipasi sering kali dibatasi oleh asimetri kekuasaan, terbatasnya kesadaran, dan fasilitasi yang tidak setara, yang membatasi keterlibatan bermakna dari kelompok marginal. Secara keseluruhan, studi ini berargumen bahwa akuntabilitas tidak dapat dicapai melalui alat teknis semata, melainkan bergantung pada kedalaman dan kualitas keterlibatan masyarakat dan sipil. Memperkuat fasilitasi, memastikan ruang partisipasi yang aman dan inklusif, serta menghubungkan temuan audit sosial ke mekanisme respons formal sangat penting untuk mencapai hasil yang lebih baik. Sintesis ini berkontribusi pada debat mengenai tata kelola partisipatif dan menawarkan wawasan praktis bagi pembuat kebijakan, praktisi pembangunan, dan aktor masyarakat sipil yang berupaya meningkatkan akuntabilitas dan inklusivitas dalam sistem kesehatan publik Bangladesh.]

Keywords

accountability Bangladesh community participation public health governance social audits

Article Details

How to Cite
Evaluating the Role of Social Audits in Strengthening Inclusive Civic Participation and Accountability in Bangladesh’s Public Health Sector: Mengevaluasi Peran Audit Sosial dalam Memperkuat Partisipasi Sipil Inklusif dan Akuntabilitas di Sektor Kesehatan Publik Bangladesh. (2026). SiRad: Pelita Wawasan, 2(1), 101-114. https://doi.org/10.64728/sirad.v2i1.art8

How to Cite

Evaluating the Role of Social Audits in Strengthening Inclusive Civic Participation and Accountability in Bangladesh’s Public Health Sector: Mengevaluasi Peran Audit Sosial dalam Memperkuat Partisipasi Sipil Inklusif dan Akuntabilitas di Sektor Kesehatan Publik Bangladesh. (2026). SiRad: Pelita Wawasan, 2(1), 101-114. https://doi.org/10.64728/sirad.v2i1.art8

References

  1. Abuga, M. M., Tenambergen, W., & Njoroge, K. (2022). Strengthening social accountability process in community health systems: Exploring the role of community actors in Africa and South Asia: Systematic review.
  2. Amin, M. R. (2025). Local governance and citizen participation: The role of decentralization in strengthening democracy in South Asia. In Making democratic decentralization work in South Asia: Looking back and ahead (pp. 325–343). Springer Nature Switzerland.
  3. Arafat, M. Y., Alam, M. M., Raz, N. H., Opee, M. F. S., & Tabassum, N. (2025). Exploring the determinants and barriers of national integrity in the context of Bangladesh. INTERDISIPLIN: Journal of Qualitative and Quantitative Research, 2(4), 291–310.
  4. Basit, A., & Islam, M. S. (2025). Beyond governance: Political consolidation and community engagement in Union Parishad Standing Committees, Bangladesh. SSRN. [Atau sertakan link URL jika tersedia]
  5. Dedar, S. M. (2025). Inclusion or exclusion: An intersectional study of social safety net programs and policies for older women with disabilities in Bangladesh [Unpublished manuscript atau Thesis].
  6. Firdaus, F., Zulfadilla, Z., & Caniago, F. (2021). Research methodology: Types in the new perspective. Manazhim, 3(1), 1–16.
  7. Gurung, G., Derrett, S., Hill, P. C., & Gauld, R. (2020). The role of social audit as a social accountability mechanism for strengthening governance and service delivery in the primary health care setting of Nepal: A qualitative study. Critical Public Health, 30(5), 612–623.
  8. Islam, S. (2025). Public finance and policy effectiveness: A review of participatory budgeting in local governance systems. SSRN 5287147.
  9. Kamal, A. M., Hassan, S. K., Ahsan, A. H. M., & Ahmed, N. (2022). Disaster accountability framework of Bangladesh: An analysis of strengths and gaps. The Dhaka University Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences, 11(1), 69–80.
  10. Mir, G., Durrani, N., Julian, R., Kimei, Y., Mashreky, S., & Doan, T. D. (2024). Social inclusion and sustainable development: Findings from seven African and Asian contexts. Sustainability, 16(11), 4859.
  11. Mollah, M. A. H. (2025). Understanding urban governance, service delivery and citizen satisfaction in Bangladesh. In Service delivery and the pulse of citizen satisfaction in urban governance of Bangladesh (pp. 1–23). Springer Nature Singapore.
  12. Naher, N., Balabanova, D., Hutchinson, E., Marten, R., Hoque, R., Tune, S. N. B. K., ... & Ahmed, S. M. (2020). Do social accountability approaches work? A review of the literature from selected low-and middle-income countries in the WHO South-East Asia region. Health Policy and Planning, 35(Supplement_1), i76–i96.
  13. Nepal, A., Dangol, S. K., & van Der Kwaak, A. (2020). Improving maternal health services through social accountability interventions in Nepal: An analytical review of existing literature. Public Health Reviews, 41(1), 31.
  14. Newman, M., & Gough, D. (2020). Systematic reviews in educational research: Methodology, perspectives and application. Systematic Reviews in Educational Research, 64(3), 3–22.
  15. Nipa, M. N., & Hasan, M. (2023). The role of civil society in promoting good governance: A qualitative inquiry into Bangladesh’s experience. Socio Economy and Policy Studies, 3(2), 91–97.
  16. Saharan, V. A., Kulhari, H., Jadhav, H., Pooja, D., Banerjee, S., & Singh, A. (2024). Introduction to research methodology. In Principles of research methodology and ethics in pharmaceutical sciences (pp. 1–46). CRC Press.
  17. Saleh, M. A. (2021). Ensuring government’s financial accountability: Role of Public Accounts Committee (PAC) in 8th and 9th Parliament of Bangladesh (Doctoral dissertation, University of Dhaka).
  18. Sarker, A. E., Razzaque, F., & Hossain, F. (2023). Conceptualizing the role of social accountability in public service delivery: A comparative study of Bangladesh, India, and Pakistan. In Handbook on Asian public administration (pp. 253–269). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  19. Shil, N. C., & Chowdhury, A. (2023). A qualitative narrative on the practices of transparency and accountability at local government institutions: The case of a Union Parishad in Bangladesh. Local Administration Journal, 16(2), 151–176.
  20. Squires, F., Martin Hilber, A., Cordero, J. P., Boydell, V., Portela, A., Lewis Sabin, M., & Steyn, P. (2020). Social accountability for reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health: A review of reviews. PLoS ONE, 15(10), e0238776.
  21. Taufiq, H. A. (2021). Role of NGOs in fostering equity and social inclusion in cities of Bangladesh: The case of Dhaka. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2107.13716
  22. Wali, M. F. I., As-Saber, S. N., Ullah, M. W., Wali, M. M. I., & Kamal, N. (2023). Evaluation in Bangladesh. In The institutionalisation of evaluation in Asia-Pacific (pp. 95–124). Springer International Publishing.
  23. Yar, F. G. M., Noori, A. S., & Zazai, J. G. (2024). Enhancing social participation in rural communities: Analyzing international experiences and practical strategies for Afghanistan. Integration: Journal of Social Sciences and Culture, 2(3), 278–295.