Peer Review

All manuscripts submitted to REACT: Research in Education and Critical Transformation undergo a double-blind peer review process to ensure academic quality, originality, and relevance to the journal's scope.

Review Workflow:

  1. Initial Screening: The editorial team reviews the manuscript for compliance with author guidelines, plagiarism check, and thematic relevance.
  2. Double-Blind Review: If the manuscript passes the initial screening, it is sent to two independent reviewers who are experts in the relevant field.
  3. Review Timeframe: Reviewers are given 2–4 weeks to complete their assessments.
  4. Revision: Based on reviewers' comments, authors may be requested to revise their manuscript. Revised manuscripts will be re-evaluated.
  5. Editorial Decision: The final decision (accept, minor revision, major revision, or reject) is made by the editor-in-chief or editorial board based on reviewers’ recommendations.
  6. Copyediting and Layout: Accepted papers undergo language editing, layout formatting, and final proofreading before publication.

All communications between authors, editors, and reviewers are managed through the OJS platform to ensure transparency and confidentiality.